You never know what's coming around the curve
I am

The O’Loughlin Files

Jan 27, 2012 in Guest Posts, Mulholland Authors

Need a cheat sheet on Joe O’Loughlin before you dive into the just-released Mulholland Books paperback edition of SHATTER or the upcoming BLEED FOR ME? Curious how a series writers keeps all the those character traits in order? Check out the below dossier on the principle characters from Robotham’s acclaimed psychological thrillers.

Name:            Professor Joseph O’Loughin (commonly known as Joe)

Profession: Clinical Psychologist

Born:            November 29, 1960, at Penrhyn Bay, Wales.

Height:          6’1”

Weight:          175 lbs

Eyes:             Brown

Joe’s own descriptions of himself:

(BLEED FOR ME) I am not handsome in the conventional sense. I am tall and pale with watery brown eyes and when I look at myself naked I am reminded of a winter animal that sheds its fur in the hotter months and looks out of place until the cold returns. That’s one of the reasons that I don’t wear shorts or T-shirts or flip flops which Australians call thongs. I wonder what they call G-strings?

(SUSPECT) Not even my mother would call me handsome. I have curly brown hair, a pear-shaped nose and skin that freckles at the first hint of sunlight.

(SHATTER) Sadly, I inherited my father’s tangle of hair. If it grows half an inch too long it becomes completely unruly and I look like I’ve been electrocuted.

Early Education:

Joe was sent to boarding school from the age of eight, attending the exclusive Charterhouse School in Surrey, England.

A single memory comes back to me, with all the light and shade of reality. I am standing on the front steps of Charterhouse as my father hugs me and feels the sob in my chest. ‘Not in front of your mother,’ he whispers.

He turns to walk away and says to my mother, ‘Not in front of the boy,’ as she dabs at her eyes.

At Charterhouse he excelled academically but not on the sporting field.

Saturday mornings and soggy sports fields seem to go together like acne and adolescence. That’s how I remember the winters of my childhood – standing ankle-deep in mud, freezing my bollocks off, playing for the school’s Second XV.

God’s-personal-physician-in-waiting (my father) had a bellow that rose above the howling wind. ‘Don’t just stand there like a cold bottle of piss,’ he’d shout. ‘Call yourself a winger! I’ve seen continents drift faster than you.’

Tertiary Studies:

Joe did three years of medicine before changing courses to study psychology and behavioural science at London University. In 1985 he obtained his Masters degree in Clinical Psychology.

I stayed on at university determined to sleep with every promiscuous, terminally uncommitted first-year on campus, but unlike other would-be Lotharios I tried too hard. I even failed miserably at being fashionably unkempt and seditious. No matter how many times I slept on someone’s floor, using my jacket as a pillow, it refused to crumple or stain. And instead of appearing grungy and intellectually blasé, I looked like someone on his way to his first job interview.

Career:

Trainee psychologist, West London Health Authority, London

Merseyside Health Authority, Liverpool

West Hammersmith Hospital, London

Royal Marsden Hospital, London

Private Practice, London

Lecturer Behavioural Science Bath University Continue reading ›

0 Comments

Walking Through a Killer’s Mind

Jan 26, 2012 in Guest Posts, Mulholland Authors

Today marks the on-sale date of Mulholland Books’ paperback edition of SHATTER by Michael Robotham–the first time the acclaimed psychological thriller has been published in the format. To celebrate the release, Michael Robotham has written an essay about the origins of series protagonist Joe O’Loughlin that looks back on his debut in SUSPECT and returns in SHATTER and BLEED FOR ME, coming from Mulholland Books in February 2012. Check it out below!

When I began writing my first novel I had no idea it was a psychological thriller. I wasn’t even sure it was a crime novel. I wrote in the first person, using the voice of clinical psychologist, Professor Joseph O’Loughlin, who was perched on the roof of the Royal Marsden Hospital in Chelsea, London, trying to talk to a teenage boy who was threatening to jump.

‘This is some view,’ I say, glancing to my right at a teenager crouched about ten feet away. His name is Malcolm and he’s seventeen today. Tall and thin, with dark eyes that tremble when he looks at me, he has skin as white as polished paper. He is wearing pajamas and a woollen hat to cover his baldness. Chemotherapy is a cruel hairdresser.

There was no hint of a crime in SUSPECT until the second chapter and depending upon which version you read (the US edition is slightly different to the rest of the world) Joe O’Loughlin doesn’t get involved in the investigation until page 65.

When the novel came out, the first question I was asked was: ‘Why crime?’

To be honest, I couldn’t answer it. I had no idea. To start with I didn’t read much crime fiction. My fascination as a reader and a writer has always rested with the characters and their motivations. The plot is important, but only as a vehicle to explore the human condition.

All crime is psychological. When a university graduate in urban preservation flies a passenger plane into a skyscraper killing thousands of people; or when a student barely out of his teens sprays a university campus with bullets; or when a teenage mother give birth in a toilet and leaves the baby in the wastepaper bin, it all comes back to some aspect of human behaviour and interaction. Everything we think we know and understand – the good, the bad and the inexplicable – is produced by four pounds of grey matter between our ears.

Continue reading ›

0 Comments

The Lineup: Weekly Links

Jan 25, 2012 in Weekly links

Contrasted Confinement

Oscar nominations are out! Congrats to Gary Oldman for his first Oscar nomination for Tinker, Tailor, Soldier Spy–but where’s Ryan Gosling and Albert Brooks for Drive? And where’s either film (or The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) in the Best Picture category?

Did you know that Contraband, the #1 movie in America earlier this month, is adapted from an Icelandic film penned by Gold Dagger Award-winner Arnaldur Indridason (Jar City, Outrage)?

You’ve probably heard by now about Miles Morales, the biracial teenager whose taken over Peter Parker’s mantle in the Brian Michael Bendis-penned Ultimate Spiderman late last year. Life and Times has a great interview with Marvel Editor-in-Chief Alex Alonso about the characters’ creation and reception.

Joe Lansdale’s EDGE OF DARK WATER has continued to receive high marks from Publishers Weekly–in addition to the earlier-mentioned starred review, EDGE OF DARK WATER has been chosen as an Editor’s Pick of PW roundup of Spring 2012 releases.
The bargain-priced publication of George Pelecanos’s WHAT IT WAS is making the rounds–check out pieces in the Wall Street Journal, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and Media Bistro.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune offered up a review of Michael Robotham’s THE WRECKAGE calling it “a pulse-pounding read perfect for these cold nights.”

And a terrific review for THE WHISPERER by Donato Carrisi ran in Shelf Awareness for Readers yesterday–not to mention the great review from Luan Gaines at Curled Up with a Good Book!

Did we missing something sweet? Share it in the comments! We’re always open to suggestions for next week’s post! Get in touch atmulhollandbooks@hbgusa.com or DM us on Twitter.

2 Comments

An Excerpt of SHATTER by Michael Robotham

Jan 24, 2012 in Excerpts, Fiction, Mulholland Authors

This week Mulholland Books celebrates our publication of SHATTER by Michael Robotham, available in paperback for the first time in bookstores across the country. Start reading the novel that Stephen King called “the most suspenseful book I read all year.”

Wipers thrash and a siren wails. From inside the car it sounds strangely muted and I keep looking over my shoulder expecting to see an approaching police car. It takes me a moment to realise that the siren is coming from somewhere closer, beneath the bonnet.

Masonry towers appear on the skyline. It is Brunel’s masterpiece, the Clifton Suspension Bridge, an engineering marvel from the age of steam.Taillights blaze. Traffic is stretched back more than mile on the approach. Sticking to the apron of the road, we sweep past the stationary cars and pull up at a roadblock where police in fluorescent vests patrol onlookers and unhappy motorists.

The constable opens my door and holds an umbrella above my head. A sheet of rain drives sideways and almost rips it from his hands. Ahead of me the bridge appears deserted. The masonry towers support massive sweeping interlinking cables that curve gracefully to the vehicle deck and rise againto the opposite side of the river.

One of the attributes of bridges is that they offer the possibility that someone may start to cross but never reach the other side. For that person the bridge is virtual; an open window that they can keep passing or climb through.

The Clifton Suspension Bridge is a landmark, a tourist attraction and a one-drop shop for suicides.has always been popular with jumpers. Well-used, oft-chosen, perhaps “popular isn’t the best choice of word.” Some people say it is actually haunted by past suicides; eerie shadows have been seen drifting across the vehicle deck.

There are no shadows today. And the only ghost on the bridge is flesh and blood. A woman, naked, standing outside the safety fence, with her back pressed to the metal lattice and wire strands. The heels of her red shoes are balancing on the edge. Continue reading ›

0 Comments

Italian Mayhem

Jan 23, 2012 in Film, Guest Posts

Today Mulholland Books celebrate the publication of George Pelecanos’ new novel WHAT IT WAS with a guest post by George on films from the 1970s, the era in which his newest is set.

WHAT IT WAS is available as an ebook for only 99 cents for one month only. A trade paperback edition is also available at $9.99, as well as a knockout of a limited edition hardcover signed by George.

I had a few days off between Christmas and New Year’s and decided to check out some of the notorious Italian crime movies from the 70’s that I’ve been reading about for so long.  These are exploitation films in the sense that they contain explicit violence and gratuitous skin shots, but like their American blaxploitation counterparts they’re not without merit.  Some folks watch these kinds of pictures to laugh at them and the era in which they were produced but I’ve never bought into that brand of ironic detachment.  In fact, I’ve always felt simpatico with filmmakers who work with relatively low budgets, do their jobs with sincerity, and are trying.  So take the suggestions below with the following caveat: these are not great films or important films, but they do have their moments.  At the very least they provided me with more signposts on my continuing film education journey.  All were available for streaming on Netflix.

Caliber 9 (1972), directed by Fernando Di Leo

Gaston Moschin plays Ugo, an ex-con who gets entangled with missing money and the Mob in the initial entry of Di Leo’s infamous Mafia trilogy.  Mario Adorf is the heavy, and beautiful Barbara Bouchet is the nominal love interest.  The first five minutes of Caliber 9 are a master class in Italian crime filmmaking, set to the score of Luis Bacalov (Django).  Moschin is a cool presence, a cross between Jason Stathem and, when he’s behind the wheel of his car, Steve McQueen.  Shades of American noir, with a nice take on criminal loyalties and an ending as fatalistic as it gets.

The Italian Connection (1972), directed by Fernando Di Leo

Luca Canali, a Milano pimp (Mario Adorf) is set up to take the fall on a lost heroin shipment and marked for death by two New York hitmen (skull-faced Henry Silva and rock-hard Woody Strode).  Violence and nudity ensue in this nasty, efficient piece of work.  Adorf is a primitive force as he goes from passive pussy-pusher to revenge machine.  The foot-and-car chase that anchors the film is worth the price of the ticket and predates Harry Callahan’s ride on the hood of the car in Magnum Force.  No one is safe in this film: mothers, children, not even kitty cats.  With Adolfo Celi (Thunderball) and Cyril Cusack.  Music by Armondo Trovajoli.  Alternate titles: Manhunt and, to entice American blaxploitation audiences into theaters, Black Kingpin.

The Boss (1973), directed by Fernando Di Leo.

The last entry in the Di Leo trilogy is a straightforward Mafia story, with button man Henry Silva involved with two warring families.  Reportedly this is a fairly accurate portrait of the Sicilian mob in the 70s.  The players here are not romanticized, and are portrayed as animalistic and amoral.  Di Leo pays tribute to The Godfather with a slaughter montage that rivals the body count of Coppola’s masterpiece.  The Boss opens with a grenade launcher assault in a movie theatre, a scene which Tarentino “referenced” in Inglorious Bastards.  Of the trilogy, this is my least favorite, but it has its champions, and its pleasures.  Music by Bacalov.  Alternate title: Wipeout!

And…

Street Law (1974), directed by Enzo Castelarri

Legendary Italian crime film cribbed from the then-popular Death Wish.  Despite its similarities to the Charles Bronson/Michael Winner smash, Street Law delivers its own brand of goods.  Franco Nero plays Carlo, the beaten and abducted bystander of a bank robbery who goes after the perpetrators when the police ignore his pleas.  After the nifty, propulsive opening, the film slow-burns to the finale, an inventive shootout in an airplane hanger.  Castellari (director of the bizarre Spaghetti Western, Keoma) was a Peckinpah freak, so there is plenty of slo-mo action and exploding squibs; he lacked Bloody Sam’s talent in the editing room, but the set pieces are nevertheless effective.  With future Bond girl Barbara Bach in the thankless role of Carlo’s girlfriend/punching bag.  This one is a little more political than the Di Leo films, and also more polished, with top notch production values and cinematography.  Features a surprisingly effective rock score by brothers Guido and Maurizio De Angelis.

George Pelecanos is the author of several bestselling novels set in and around Washington D.C. He is also an independent-film producer, an essayist, the recipient of numerous international writing awards, and a producer of the HBO hit series The Wire. He currently writes for the Emmy-nominated writer of the HBO series Treme.

His newest novel WHAT IT WAS is on sale today. Check out clips of George discussing WHAT IT WAS in DC spots that figure prominently in the novel after the jump: Continue reading ›

2 Comments

Which Handgun Should You Use for a Murder?

Jan 20, 2012 in Guest Posts

If we go by movies and TV, murders are most frequently committed with semi-automatic pistols in either 9mm or .45 caliber. Whether it’s a crime of passion, a gangbanger spray-down, or a calculated assassination, the camera prefers the sleek, sexy lines of a semi-automatic over the bulkier revolver. Novels too seem to contain an overwhelming penchant for the semi-auto pistol. This is natural since the variety of semi-auto pistols has mushroomed in the past 30 years. A semi-auto pistol generally holds more rounds than a revolver and is easier to reload in a high-stress situation. Increased firepower is an attractive feature.

For writers, another beauty of the semi-automatic pistol is that it leaves evidence behind: shell casings. Even readers who have never owned or handled a gun now assume that at the scene of a crime there will be one or more empty casings thrown from fired weapons. To be sure, a shell casing offers a great deal of information that can be used as evidence to both solve a crime and to convict the perpetrator.

Most cartridge casings are made from brass. Brass is softer than the steel which is used to make the business components of a pistol: barrel, firing pin, ejector, firing chamber. The steel of these components will leave scratches and indentations on brass. For instance, the firing pin in a specific gun hits a bullet primer in a specific place every time. This spot may be centered or off center to the left or right or up or down. The indentation will have a specific depth. The surface of the firing pin will leave microscopic scratches on the primer that correspond to the wear marks on the firing pin. Those specific characteristics of that specific firing pin in that specific gun will match the empty shell casing to the gun and are hard evidence for prosecutors. Continue reading ›

5 Comments

Review: Choke Hold by Christa Faust

Jan 19, 2012 in Guest Posts

Christa Faust’s last novel, Money Shot, is a Saturn 5 booster rocket of a novel. Filled with an atomic energy that makes every inch of clever prose swell, and an edgy, funny realism that makes its subject matter sing, it’s also the novel that introduced crime readers to Angel Dare. Tough and clever, she was the beating, bruised heart that fueled Money Shot’s roaring rampage of revenge and put her – and her novel – into the pantheon of instant crime classics. It’s a real page-turning, stay-up-all-night, I-forgot-books-were-this-much-fun novel.

So of course Faust’s next novel featuring Angel Dare, Choke Hold, had to deliver one hell of an encore. It does – but not like readers may expect.

Let’s get this out of the way first: Choke Hold is bleak. Bleak, bleak, bleak, bleak, bleak. Blacker than highway diner coffee and as unrelenting as Money Shot was propulsive, Choke Hold ends its first chapter with bullets and it doesn’t get any better for Angel from there. Hooking up with the son of an old boyfriend/costar, the ex-porn star turned government witness is soon on the run along the U.S./Mexico border. From there, and on page after page, Choke Hold delivers a gut-punching reminder that the theme of all noir is “You’re fucked.” It’s commendable that Faust delivers a sequel that doesn’t give the audience what they expected. At the end of Money Shot, Faust left many possibilities open for Angel, but by the end of Choke Hold, she leaves the reader with a feeling that this was the only way it could have played out. Continue reading ›

0 Comments

The Lineup: Weekly Links

Jan 18, 2012 in Weekly links

Contrasted ConfinementTHE REVISIONISTS author Thomas Mullen’s poignant essay on a song that reminds him of winter ran on NPR at the end of last week. Check it out!

Speaking of Tom, USA Today‘s Pop Traveler blog mentions Thomas Mullen in a roundup of Atlanta by Rachel Mason.

The first trade review of Joe R. Lansdale’s EDGE OF DARK WATER has just been published! In a starred review, Publishers Weekly wrote of Lansdale’s upcoming novel: “Edgar-winner Lansdale channels Mark Twain in this chillingly atmospheric stand-alone. Lansdale’s perfect ear for regional dialogue and ability to create palpable suspense lift this above the pack.” PW’s review joins a stellar list of blurbs from the likes of  Dan Simmons, Joe Hill, Daniel Woodrell, David Morrell, and Bruce Campbell.

Nick Santora, author of the upcoming FIFTEEN DIGITS and writer of  The Sopranos, Law & Order, Prison Break and Breakout Kings, has a killer new website! Check it out here.

Mark Krajnak has a moody tribute to a David Goodis-inspired trip that you should check out below:

Don’t miss the beautiful stop-motion video put together by booksellers that has everyone talking:


…and you might notice something a little different about Google, Wikipedia, Reddit, Boing Boing and more today. Here’s why.

Did we missing something sweet? Share it in the comments! We’re always open to suggestions for next week’s post! Get in touch atmulhollandbooks@hbgusa.com or DM us on Twitter.

0 Comments

Pulling Weeds

Jan 17, 2012 in Guest Posts, Writing

Grassy Field, Noir et Blanc

People frequently ask how it was that I became a writer. The answer surprises them. “Pulling weeds,” I say, and then watch their face go blank. But it’s true. My love of books developed from an abhorrence of gardening, specifically my mother’s favorite punishment. She’d make my nine brothers and sisters and I pull weeds. So here’s my story.

Chapter One

Pulling Weeds or,

Never Tell a mother of 10 you’re bored.

I’m one of 10 kids. My Irish Catholic mother had a number of sayings. One of her favorites was when we would complain about being cold. She’d say, “Put a sweater on. I’m not heating the neighborhood.”

But the one that hit home for me was if I said, “I’m bored.” With that much on her plate, my mother was not about to stop to entertain me. So she’d say, “You’re bored? Here’s a bag, go pull weeds.” When I objected, she’d respond, “Read a book.” Then she’d hand me one.

At first I thought this as bad as pulling weeds. But one of the first books my mother handed me was The Count of Monte Cristo. I devoured it. By the time I was thirteen I must have been bored a lot because my mother, an English major in college, had handed me some of the classics. The Old Man and The Sea, The Red Badge of Courage, The Lord of the Flies, Of Mice and Men, To Kill a Mockingbird.

And many more. And that’s when I knew. I wanted to write books.

Chapter Two

Compulsive Over achievers or

Why it sucks to be the middle child in a family of 10.

With my older siblings in medical school or on their way to helping their fellow brethren as doctors, announcing that I intended to move back home with mom and dad to write a novel seemed like an invitation for my brothers to ridicule me mercilessly, as only brothers can. So even though I knew since the seventh grade that I wanted to be a writer and I had majored at Stanford University in journalism and creative writing, there was always this underlying current that when you graduated from college you went to professional school. I did what most who don’t want to be doctors do…I considered law school.

Chapter Three

The UCLA 1L or,

Scott Turow Lied

Right around 1984 a book came out called The Harvard 1L. It was written by a law student, Scot Turow, and not just while attending any law school, but Harvard Law School. I took this as a tacit representation that it was possible to attend law school and write a novel. So off I went to UCLA to study law and write my first novel.

In first year torts I learned that a misrepresentation is the presentation of a fact that the speaker makes knowing said fact to be false, intending that said fact be relied upon by others, that is relied upon by others and that inflicts damage. I memorized this because the first thing I intended to do when I graduated law school and received my law license was to sue Scott Turow. I quickly found that I barely had enough time to study, let alone to write anything even remotely resembling a novel. I briefly considered dropping out, but compulsive overachievers don’t quit and, at worst, I believed that the law would be a great fall back profession if my writing career did not pan out. Continue reading ›

2 Comments

Cold Blood: On Jim Thompson and Stanley Kubrick

Jan 13, 2012 in Film, Guest Posts, Writing

This article was originally published in One More Robot #8

In the mind of crime fiction aficionados, the brooding image of pulp writers from the 40s and 50s usually resembles a haunting Edward Hooper painting of doomed loners sloughed at a rickety desk inside a dimly lit hotel room. Knocking out stories for a penny a word to keep the bookies at bay, bourbon in their system and the landlord off their backs, rarely were these bleak fellows thought of as family men.

While that pathetic portrayal fits authors David Goodis and Cornell Woolrich, paperback writer Jim Thompson was a different kind of literary animal. Although Thompson suffered from legendary bouts with the bottle (when he was a boy, his grandfather gave him whiskey with breakfast), he was also a married man with three children and a house in the suburbs. He wore suits and ties and rarely rolled around in the gutter with his contemporaries.

“He’d take any job, you know, to earn a living and feed his family,” Thompson’s long-suffering wife Alberta, whom he married in 1931, once told an interviewer. Until Thompson’s death in 1977 at 70 years old, his wife stood by her man through drunkenness, money woes and sickness. As his friend and former editor Arnold Hano pointed out in 1991, “unhappy endings were his style.”

Although Jim Thompson’s twenty-nine novels were out of print when he died, in 1984 writer and David Lynch collaborator Barry Gifford (Wild at Heart, Lost Highway) teamed-up with the Berkeley based publishers Creative Arts Book Company to create Black Lizard Press. Featuring gaudy covers by Kirwan, the Black Lizard books were all about pulp fiction when Tarantino was still clerking in a video store.

Reprinting the novels of forgotten authors David Goodis, Charles Willeford, Peter Rabe, Harry Whittington and others, Black Lizard was thrilling and seductive, enticing a brand new generation of crime fiction fans. As a young crime movie geek and New York City writer hanging-out at St. Mark Books, it was during this period that I first discovered the cold-blooded “noir” writers that changed my life.

Today, more than thirty years after Jim Thompson’s death, his brutal novels has influenced a generation of neo-noir writers including Ken Bruen, Jason Starr and the late Jerry Rodriguez. Drawn to the dangerous appeal of his “sociopaths and suckers,” as crime writer and film critic Stephen Hunter once described his characters, Thompson’s disturbing universe never got boring. Continue reading ›

7 Comments